Deal with banks could mean millions of dollars in help for Connecticut homeowners

January 24, 2012

By Ana Radelat

Washington -- A deal between five major banks and a group of attorneys general -- including George Jepsen of Connecticut -- could bring $150 million or more to state homeowners who have been victims of foreclosures or the burst of the housing bubble.

The banks involved in the negotiations -- the Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citibank and Ally Financial -- were accused of "robo-signing" foreclosure documents and other fraudulent conduct and could pay up to $25 billion in the settlement. The money would be disbursed by formula to Connecticut and other states that agree to the deal, Jepsen said.

That could provide the state with millions of dollars to counsel homeowners in financial trouble.

Connecticut could receive millions more in refinancing help for homeowners who are up-to-date on their mortgages but owe more than their homes are worth. Under current regulations, homeowners who are "underwater" can't refinance their loans.

Mortgages of these "underwater" borrowers could also be decreased by tens of thousands of dollars. But only the mortgages held or serviced by the five banks involved in the negotiations would be eligible for the write-downs.

The refinancing help and write-down of mortgages would be available only to homeowners who borrowed money in 2008 through 2011.

The settlement is the result of 18 months of talks among the U.S. Justice Department, the attorneys general and the five big banks that are responsible for about 65 percent of the privately held mortgages in the United States.

But the deal won't be of much help to those who have already lost their homes to foreclosure, although some would receive a check for about $1,800 as "rough justice money."

Jepsen, a member of the negotiating team, traveled to Chicago Monday to discuss the agreement with Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, Justice Department officials and other Democratic attorney generals. Republican attorneys general were briefed on the "agreement in principle" in a conference call Monday evening.

The timing of a final agreement is unclear. "I don't want to be premature, but things appear to be moving in the right direction," Jepsen said Tuesday.

There's one downside to the deal: Once the agreement is signed, banks are likely to pick up the pace on processing foreclosures, which had slowed during the 18 months of negotiations.

According to the latest survey by the Mortgage Bankers Association, nearly 8 percent of the mortgages in Connecticut are more than 90 days delinquent. That's close to the national rate, but much lower than other states like California, where the delinquency rate is 18 percent and Florida, where it is 23 percent.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Connecticut's attorney general before he was elected to Congress, was in the original group that initiated the investigation of the banks. He said he hoped the deal helps a lot of homeowners in trouble and helps minimize the expected new wave of foreclosures.

But he said the deal is just "one step" in a process, "not a conclusion."

"I'm going to continue my efforts on the (Senate) Judiciary Committee to investigate mortgage servicers ... and to bring to justice the bankers who may still be pursued," Blumenthal said.

While Connecticut homeowners may get relief under the deal, New Yorkers won't.

Last year New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman left the group of attorneys general pursuing the banks. Schneiderman said his colleagues weren't tough enough, and he's conducting his own investigation.

But all New England states have agreed to the terms of the deal, although Massachusetts is looking for more money because its laws give the state more leverage over the banks.

Please login or register to post comments

Not a member of The Connecticut Mirror yet?

Be a part of The Connecticut Mirror community, comment on stories, receive e-mail news updates and more!

Comments

This sweetheart deal is an

This sweetheart deal is an absolute loss for CT citizens and homeowners. As it stands, Federal and State agencies will be barred from ANY investigations into the massive fraud that not only put people into homes they couldn't afford, but the numerous and still unresolved problems many homeowners and bank customers are currently having with their mortgages (being told their documents cannot be found, misleading directions, totally lost titles to people's Homes!).

The money being offered is hush money and a pittance at that. Less than 10% of the total settlement will go to those who've been foreclosed on (some

Read More

To r_sam. What you write

To r_sam. What you write sounds great however what would you proposes as a solution. How about the 80%( 48 million of the total 60 million mortgages that exists) of people who played by the rules and are not in trouble. These people are irrate that some people may get their principal written down.Do you propose to help people that refinanced and kept taking money out of their house to live better than you or I. ? How about the investors and speculators ? Do you want to help them. How about people that bought in over their head and

Read More

The "help" that is being

The "help" that is being offered to home owners (and i agree with Don above)amounts to about two house payments. When these folks are in so far over their head in debt, this is not going to help them much. This ploy is just that - a political ploy.

What better way to secure votes than make it look like you really care about the damage you have already done?

It is sad commentary that the

It is sad commentary that the punishment for bank fraud has been reduced to a cost of doing business. 25 Billion is small punishment for the criminal bankers. When will we send some of these guys to jail?

I don't understand why this settlement only applies to newer loans.
Obama's mortgage modification program would have prevented a lot of this problem, particularly for those whose mortgages were originated prior to 2008. Unfortunately the program was optional from the beginning and the banks only modified about 10% of the eligible loans.

The blood-letting flow of mortgage foreclosures will surely extend the

Read More