NEW BRITAIN -- With unemployment in the construction trades topping 30 percent, it was easy to round up a crowd Thursday night to stand behind the controversial Hartford-to-New Britain Busway, a $567 million project that could mean 4,100 construction jobs, beginning this fall.
"We are ready to build," said Jeffrey Merrow, the business manager of Laborers Local 611, offering an easy applause line to burly construction workers, many wearing evidence of a bad economy: shiny hard hats and clean boots. "And the naysayers are just naysaying."
To John G. Rowland, the radio talk host, the busway is reliable drive-time fodder, a 9.4-mile boondoggle costing a whopping $60 million a mile. But, as one speaker recalled, the project actually was conceived on his watch as governor, then shaped by the administration of his successor, M. Jodi Rell.
Gov. Dannel P. Malloy gave his approval in June, essentially greenlighting a project that has been in the planning stages since 1997, when Rowland was a first-term governor. The state's share is $96.4 million, plus an estimated annual operating subsidy of $7 million.
"You've got to give Gov. Malloy a lot of credit," said Oz Griebel, a Republican candidate for governor in 2010. "The thing that's been missing all this time is a gubernatorial push."
Griebel, who runs the region's biggest business group, the MetroHartford Alliance, stood with laborers, environmentalists, Democratic legislators and union leaders in support of a project he says is long overdue, as both an economic stimulus and an investment in the state's transportation infrastructure.
Roy Occhiogrosso, the governor's senior adviser, said he did not believe that the rally was a sign that the project was in political jeopardy, but rather an effort to make sure that supporters are just as vocal as opponents.
"Like so many other issues, it's a jobs issue. For people who want to be put to work, and there are many of them, this is important," said Roy Occhiogrosso, the governor's senior adviser.
At an informational meeting that followed the outdoor rally on the Central Connecticut State University campus, a senior DOT official predicted final federal and environmental approvals will come in time for construction to begin this fall, with completion slated for August 2014.
The plans are available online.
To the senior staff at DOT, the busway is the state's first venture in true rapid transit, an effort applauded by environmentalist and business groups as easing highway congestion and spinning off transit-oriented development. To organized labor, the project simply means jobs.
Lori J. Pelletier, the secretary-treasurer of the Connecticut AFL-CIO, said the project is an economic stimulus at a time when the federal government has seemingly given up on stimulus in favor of deficit reduction.
"The entire labor movement is behind this project," she said.
After a long battle over state employee concessions, Malloy is hardly a popular figure in labor circles, but the construction trades are an exception.
"We have a governor in Connecticut who gets it," Merrow shouted. "Dannel Malloy gets it."
The biggest chunk of the federal funding, $269.7 million in so-called "New Starts" transit money, would be lost to Connecticut if the project does not go forward. Under federal rules, it could not be redirected to other state transportation projects.
Michael Sanders, the DOT's public transit administrator, said the project began as a way to alleviate congestion on I-84 corridor to the west of Hartford, the region's most heavily traveled commuter route. Alternatives included widening the highway and building light rail.
"The busway came in at the lowest cost," he said.
Sanders said the 9.4-mile busway was the spine of larger regional bus network. It would function much like the MBTA trolley system in Boston, with special buses stopping at 11 stations every three minutes at peak times.
But many of the existing commuter buses that now crawl along I-84 west of Hartford would funnel into the busway, speeding past the region's most congested stretch of highway, he said.
Other buses using the busway would ply feeder routes, connecting the UConn Health Center and Westfarms mall to the system. Using federal ridership models, the DOT expects a ridership of 16,000 riders.
Opponents have not given up on stopping the project.
State Sen. Joseph Markley, R-Southington, said in a telephone interview that opponents will fight the granting of environmental permits at a hearing next month. They also will continue to urge the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives to block funding.
"I'll fight it by any means I can," Markley said. "The whole project is a waste of money."
At the informational hearing, another Republican legislator challenged Sander's assertion that the remaining federal approvals are nearly certain, since the project was developed in close cooperation with federal transit authorities.
"I don't share that confidence," Rep. Whit Betts, R-Bristol, told Sanders, warning that that state could start the project and find itself without sufficient money for completion.
But Sanders replied that the federal officials either will approve the entire funding package - or nothing.
"It's really all or nothing," Sanders said. "If we don't get the New Starts money, there's not going to be a project."
I served on the Transportation Strategy Board for 3 years. In my opinion, the chief value of the New Britain busway is as a stimulus project.
The reason that elected officials use stimulus as an economic tool is to avoid further short term economic hardship. By bonding state dollars, attracting matching federal money, and temporarily employing contruction labor, the New Britain busway is a classic state stimulus project.
Whether you agree with the value of stimulus projects or not, what proponents fail to do is to convince opponents of the wisdom of short term
Read MoreThis is the biggest waste of taxpayers dollar ever conceived for the state of Connecticut. I agree it will create thousands of short term construction jobs at the prevailing union wage scale. That's it. Once the project is completed those jobs are gone. Nobody who owns a car is going to ride this thing once it's complete. The starting point is in downtown New Britain miles away from I-84. It ends at Union Station which is a hike to the convention center and civic center which are the hubs of activity in downtown Hartford.
Read MoreWasn't the busway part of Rell's transportation initiative in 2006?
These construction jobs at prevailing construction industry wages are nothing but a big white elephant. We have to starve to feed these construction workers. They have very big lobbying groups and individually each one of thesee workers can make noises with their big mouths that can be heard throughout the state and the country. Imagine a construction worker that stands there with a flag making four times the minimum wage, because they are all considered to be seasonal jobs. The state government is scrambling to save nickels and dimes by laying off low-wage state workers, and here in the construction
Read MoreFirst off this is an obscene waste of taxpayer money. I proudly stand with Senator Joe Markley, one of the few in the State Capitol who care first and foremost about protecting the taxpayers of this state, in his opposition to this Construction Union payback...excuse me I mean, this Governor's plan.
Secondly, instead of wasting $660 million dollars to build this nonsense, instead why don't they give every Man, woman and child in this state a roughly $200 check? If the money were spent that way, I wouldn't be here complaining about it. Which would you rather have? A total
Read MoreThis is a classic example of vote buying - pure and simple. Nothing more. Nothing less. It's yet another aspect of Democrat money laundering: Unions contribute millions to Dem' pol's and then the Dem' pol's return the favor by creating so-called "stimulus" projects that aren't necessary or even wanted, but it 'pays back' the unions for their loyalty.
Simply, here's how it works: Union workers pay their dues and the Union leadership makes the donations to the Democrat pol's. And then the pol's return the favor by squandering the taxpayer's money on projects
Read MoreGovernmental Puppetiering at it's finest. Hear it and you will believe. This is all just one big farce. Distractions from the real problems. CUT SPENDING??? CUT SPENDING?? CUT SPENDING?? If i cant afford a new fence for my house, i work with the one I have. If I cannot afford to buy paint for my house, i deal with the color. What would be the problem to hold off on ALL NON-essential spending for a year? OR TWO? Hmmmmmm.. What do i need? Food, water, clothing and a roof over
Read MoreIt's appalling as a Fairfield County resident that hundreds of millions get spent on dubious projects in the Greater Hartford area, while I-95 is a parking lot 7 days a week thanks to inaction over bottlenecks like Exit 14 in Norwalk. Hartford's transportation infrastructure is fine as it is. Fix the rest of the State.
The DOT issues a report each year regarding usage for the HOV lanes on I-384, I-84 and I-91 going back to the first year in 1989. The statistics were compiled during the busiest time of day, the morning rush hour. Some of those statistics include Connecticut Transit Express bus usage, which will be sued on the proposed busway. Some statistics for the rush hour are below per the 2009 and 2010 reports.
In 2009 the 84/384 westbound HOV lanes used 12 express buses carrying approximately 288 people, averaging only 24 people per bus. Capacity was 50 people. That amounts to
Read MoreI agree with DanCt's comments 100 percent. The HV Lanes on 84 should have been shut down years ago. They would be better served opened to all vehicle traffic. The Bus Way is a gigantic white elephant and waste of taxpayers money. The money saved would be better spent reducing the tax burden on this state.
So many politicians agree to cuts but then say that the police or fire departments have to be cut. They use the most publicly agreeable places to get voters to say"Oh you can't cut THAT" so then the politicians say we have to then raise taxes. This is like my family saying I am going to not pay my mortgage or utilities but I am still going to pay for my favorite cable and night out on the town.
People - WISE UP. The next election please go and vote for ANYBODY that is NOT in office!!